Value of information methods to design a clinical trial in a small population to optimise a health economic utility function

Abstract : Background. Most confirmatory randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) are designed with specified power, usually 80% or 90%, for a hypothesis test conducted at a given significance level, usually 2.5% for a one-sided test. Approval of the experimental treatment by regulatory agencies is then based on the result of such a significance test with other information to balance the risk of adverse events against the benefit of the treatment to future patients. In the setting of a rare disease, recruiting sufficient patients to achieve conventional error rates for clinically reasonable effect sizes may be infeasible, suggesting that the decision-making process should reflect the size of the target population. Methods. We considered the use of a decision-theoretic value of information (VOI) method to obtain the optimal sample size and significance level for confirmatory RCTs in a range of settings. We assume the decision maker represents society. For simplicity we assume the primary endpoint to be normally distributed with unknown mean following some normal prior distribution representing information on the anticipated effectiveness of the therapy available before the trial. The method is illustrated by an application in an RCT in haemophilia A. We explicitly specify the utility in terms of improvement in primary outcome and compare this with the costs of treating patients, both financial and in terms of potential harm, during the trial and in the future. Results. The optimal sample size for the clinical trial decreases as the size of the population decreases. For non-zero cost of treating future patients, either monetary or in terms of potential harmful effects, stronger evidence is required for approval as the population size increases, though this is not the case if the costs of treating future patients are ignored. Conclusions. Decision-theoretic VOI methods offer a flexible approach with both type I error rate and power (or equivalently trial sample size) depending on the size of the future population for whom the treatment under investigation is intended. This might be particularly suitable for small populations when there is considerable information about the patient population.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
BMC Medical Research Methodology, BioMed Central, 2018, 18 (1), pp.20. 〈10.1186/s12874-018-0475-0〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-01706249
Contributeur : Bmc Bmc <>
Soumis le : dimanche 11 février 2018 - 05:37:07
Dernière modification le : mercredi 14 février 2018 - 01:16:17

Fichiers

12874_2018_Article_475.pdf
Publication financée par une institution

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Michael Pearce, Siew Wan Hee, Jason Madan, Martin Posch, Simon Day, et al.. Value of information methods to design a clinical trial in a small population to optimise a health economic utility function. BMC Medical Research Methodology, BioMed Central, 2018, 18 (1), pp.20. 〈10.1186/s12874-018-0475-0〉. 〈inserm-01706249〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

18

Téléchargements de fichiers

1